State v. Barber

839 S.W.2d 387, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1645, 1992 WL 314016
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 3, 1992·No. No. 60804·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Lonzo Barber (Defendant) appeals from his conviction for kidnapping and first degree robbery. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b). The verdict is supported by the evidence, and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Barber, 839 S.W.2d 387, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1645, 1992 WL 314016 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

839 S.W.2d 387 (State v. Barber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.