Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Barber

State v. Barber

533 So. 2d 890, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2468, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4859
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 8, 1988
DocketNos. 87-2971, 87-3007
StatusPublished

This text of 533 So. 2d 890 (State v. Barber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Barber, 533 So. 2d 890, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2468, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4859 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse. The trial court failed to provide a contemporaneous written statement setting forth the reasons for the guidelines departure. State v. Oden, 478 So.2d 51 (Fla.1985), appeal after remand, 502 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); State v. Williams, 515 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Ree v. State, 512 So.2d 1085 (Fla 4th DCA 1987); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). The defendant should be given an opportunity to withdraw his plea. Williams.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ree v. State
512 So. 2d 1085 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
State v. Williams
515 So. 2d 1051 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Oden v. State
502 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
533 So. 2d 890, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2468, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barber-fladistctapp-1988.