State v. Barbee
This text of State v. Barbee (State v. Barbee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Joshua Barbee, Appellant.
Appeal From Aiken County
Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-320
Submitted June 1, 2010 Filed June 22,
2010
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.
J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Joshua Barbee appeals the revocation of his probation. On appeal, Barbee argues the trial court abused its discretion "by not continuing [him] on probation, [and giving] him an active [youthful offender] sentence, when a lesser punishment was appropriate." The trial court acted within its discretion in revoking Barbee's probation. S.C. Code Ann. § 24-21-460 (2007). We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Shumate, 276 S.C. 46, 47, 275 S.E.2d 288, 288 (1981) (holing a defendant's failure "to object to or seek modification of the revocation sentence in the trial court" precludes challenging the sentence on appeal).
AFFIRMED.
FEW, C.J., WILLIAMS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Barbee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-barbee-scctapp-2010.