State v. Baran

Connecticut Appellate Court

State v. Baran

743 A.2d 1164, 56 Conn. App. 904, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 9

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedJanuary 4, 2000

DocketAC 19009

StatusPublished

This text of 743 A.2d 1164 (State v. Baran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Baran, 743 A.2d 1164, 56 Conn. App. 904, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 9 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant, in appealing from his conviction of the misdemeanor of making an improper lane change in violation of General Statutes § 14-236 after a trial de novo by the trial court, claims that his constitutional rights were infringed because he was impeded in his effort to present his case and because various court officials acted in a manner prejudicial to him.

After a thorough review of the record, transcripts and briefs and after affording the appropriate scope of review to those claims which are properly before us, we conclude that the defendant’s assertions have no merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant, in appealing from his conviction of the misdemeanor of making an improper lane change in violation of General Statutes § 14-236 after a trial de novo by the trial court, claims that his constitutional rights were infringed because he was impeded in his effort to present his case and because various court officials acted in a manner prejudicial to him.

After a thorough review of the record, transcripts and briefs and after affording the appropriate scope of review to those claims which are properly before us, we conclude that the defendant’s assertions have no merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

743 A.2d 1164, 56 Conn. App. 904, 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baran-connappct-2000.