State v. Banning
This text of 532 So. 2d 751 (State v. Banning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Granted in part. The defense is entitled to a complete answer to No. 33 of its bill of particulars and to reurge its motion to quash prior to trial on the basis of the facts in that answer (or facts stipulated by the prosecutor). State v. Anthony, 427 So.2d 1155 (La.1983). Accordingly, the case is remanded to the district court, and the district attorney is ordered to provide a complete answer to No. 33 of the bill of particulars to defendant within twenty-four hours. The trial court is ordered to reconsider the motion to quash in the light of the prosecutor’s answer and of State v. Williams, 480 So.2d 721 (La.1985). Otherwise, the application is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
532 So. 2d 751, 1988 La. LEXIS 2271, 1988 WL 116387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-banning-la-1988.