State v. Banning

532 So. 2d 751, 1988 La. LEXIS 2271, 1988 WL 116387
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 1, 1988·No. No. 88-KK-2627·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Granted in part. The defense is entitled to a complete answer to No. 33 of its bill of particulars and to reurge its motion to quash prior to trial on the basis of the facts in that answer (or facts stipulated by the prosecutor). State v. Anthony, 427 So.2d 1155 (La.1983). Accordingly, the case is remanded to the district court, and the district attorney is ordered to provide a complete answer to No. 33 of the bill of particulars to defendant within twenty-four hours. The trial court is ordered to reconsider the motion to quash in the light of the prosecutor’s answer and of State v. Williams, 480 So.2d 721 (La.1985). Otherwise, the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Banning, 532 So. 2d 751, 1988 La. LEXIS 2271, 1988 WL 116387 (La. 1988).

532 So. 2d 751 (State v. Banning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Anthony
427 So. 2d 1155 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1983)
State v. Williams
480 So. 2d 721 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1985)