State v. Banner

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Banner

639 S.W.2d 869

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 4, 1982

DocketNo. 43791

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 639 S.W.2d 869 (State v. Banner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Banner, 639 S.W.2d 869 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CLEMENS, Senior Judge.

A jury found defendant Yerzell Banner guilty of stealing the victim’s purse and the court sentenced him to six months in jail. Section 570.030 RSMo.

Here defendant contends the trial court erred in not instructing the jury it could fix punishment at a fine in lieu of imprisonment. The same contention was raised and refuted in State v. VanHorn, 625 S.W.2d 874 [1-4] (Mo.1982).

Since a formal opinion would have no value as precedent we affirm in compliance with Rule 84.16(b)(5).

REINHARD, P.J., and SNYDER and CRIST, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CLEMENS, Senior Judge.

A jury found defendant Yerzell Banner guilty of stealing the victim’s purse and the court sentenced him to six months in jail. Section 570.030 RSMo.

Here defendant contends the trial court erred in not instructing the jury it could fix punishment at a fine in lieu of imprisonment. The same contention was raised and refuted in State v. VanHorn, 625 S.W.2d 874 [1-4] (Mo.1982).

Since a formal opinion would have no value as precedent we affirm in compliance with Rule 84.16(b)(5).

REINHARD, P.J., and SNYDER and CRIST, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

639 S.W.2d 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-banner-moctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack