State v. Banks

795 A.2d 847, 171 N.J. 466, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 248
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 26, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 795 A.2d 847 (State v. Banks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Banks, 795 A.2d 847, 171 N.J. 466, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 248 (N.J. 2002).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 349 N.J.Super. 234, 793 A.2d 720 (2001).

Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices STEIN, COLEMAN, • VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, and ZAZZALI join in this opinion. Justice LONG has filed a separate, dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
State v. Banks
793 A.2d 720 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
795 A.2d 847, 171 N.J. 466, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-banks-nj-2002.