State v. Banks
795 A.2d 847, 171 N.J. 466, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 248
Opinions
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 349 N.J.Super. 234, 793 A.2d 720 (2001).
Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices STEIN, COLEMAN, • VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, and ZAZZALI join in this opinion. Justice LONG has filed a separate, dissenting opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Banks, 795 A.2d 847, 171 N.J. 466, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 248 (N.J. 2002).
795 A.2d 847 (State v. Banks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
State v. Banks
793 A.2d 720 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)