State v. Banks

386 Mont. 63
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 5, 2016
DocketCAUSE NO. DC-13-3557
StatusPublished

This text of 386 Mont. 63 (State v. Banks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Banks, 386 Mont. 63 (Mo. 2016).

Opinion

DECISION

On March 31, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to the Montana Department of Corrections for a period of five (5) years, for the offense of Amended Count I: Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, a Felony, in violation of §45-9-102, MCA. The Court granted credit for time served in the amount of 345 days.

On August 5, 2016, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant appeared by Vision Net from Dawson County Correctional Facility and was represented by Brent Getty of the Office of the State Public Defender. The State was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Hon. Brenda Gilbert, Chairperson, Hon. Kathy Seeley, Member and Hon. Brad Newman, Member.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
386 Mont. 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-banks-mont-2016.