State v. Banks

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Banks

285 S.W.3d 838, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 984, 2009 WL 1856217

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2009·No. ED 91624·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*839 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Rashaad Banks appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of robbery and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*839 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Rashaad Banks appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of robbery and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Banks, 285 S.W.3d 838, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 984, 2009 WL 1856217 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

285 S.W.3d 838 (State v. Banks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related