State v. Bankowski

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Bankowski

570 So. 2d 1152, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9559, 1990 WL 205489

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 19, 1990

DocketNo. 88-1199

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 570 So. 2d 1152 (State v. Bankowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bankowski, 570 So. 2d 1152, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9559, 1990 WL 205489 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In our order dated September 21, 1990, we indicated this cause had been en banced. This was because we sensed possible conflict with a prior decision of this court, State v. Thomas, 536 So.2d 341 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

The unusually long en banc proceedings, during which the case was circulated amongst all twelve judges of the court at least twice, accounts in part for the extreme delay in bringing this matter to final disposition. For this delay, we express our apologies to the parties, attorneys, and all others concerned.

As the September 21, 1990, order reflects, the en banc proceedings resulted in a tie vote, and pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.331(a) the matter was returned to the original panel. The original panel had determined the trial court should be affirmed.

Accordingly, the order of the trial court granting the motion to suppress is affirmed.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI