State v. Bankhead

2009 Ohio 4303, 123 Ohio St. 3d 143
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 1, 2009
Docket2007-0818
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2009 Ohio 4303 (State v. Bankhead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bankhead, 2009 Ohio 4303, 123 Ohio St. 3d 143 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Bloomer, 122 Ohio St.3d 200, 2009-Ohio-2462, 909 N.E.2d 1254. Appellant is discharged from postrelease control because he has completed serving his prison *144 sentence and, pursuant to State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94, 2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961, is no longer subject to resentencing.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Scott M. Heenan, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Michaela M. Stagnaro, for appellant. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Olding
2010 Ohio 4171 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2009 Ohio 4303, 123 Ohio St. 3d 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bankhead-ohio-2009.