State v. Bankhead

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Bankhead

2009 Ohio 4303, 123 Ohio St. 3d 143

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 1, 2009·No. 2007-0818·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Bloomer, 122 Ohio St.3d 200, 2009-Ohio-2462, 909 N.E.2d 1254. Appellant is discharged from postrelease control because he has completed serving his prison *144 sentence and, pursuant to State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94, 2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961, is no longer subject to resentencing.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Scott M. Heenan, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Michaela M. Stagnaro, for appellant. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Bloomer, 122 Ohio St.3d 200, 2009-Ohio-2462, 909 N.E.2d 1254. Appellant is discharged from postrelease control because he has completed serving his prison *144 sentence and, pursuant to State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94, 2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961, is no longer subject to resentencing.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Scott M. Heenan, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Michaela M. Stagnaro, for appellant. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

State v. Bankhead, 2009 Ohio 4303, 123 Ohio St. 3d 143 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

2009 Ohio 4303 (State v. Bankhead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related