State v. Ballard
507 S.E.2d 38, 349 N.C. 286, 1998 N.C. LEXIS 719
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion for the Court of Appeals by Martin (John C.), J., the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. We conclude that defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
REVERSED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Ballard, 507 S.E.2d 38, 349 N.C. 286, 1998 N.C. LEXIS 719 (N.C. 1998).
507 S.E.2d 38 (State v. Ballard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Robbs
671 S.E.2d 377 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
State v. Edwards
621 S.E.2d 333 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)