State v. Ballard

356 S.W.3d 789, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1561, 2011 WL 5864333
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 2011·No. ED 95530·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James H. Ballard appeals the judgment entered upon the jury’s verdict convicting him of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, two counts of first-degree endangering the welfare of a child, one count of second-degree statutory sodomy, and two counts of use of a child in a sexual performance. We find that the trial court did not erroneously deprive Ballard of his right to self-representation, nor did the court err in excluding certain evidence at trial.

*790 An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ballard, 356 S.W.3d 789, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1561, 2011 WL 5864333 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

356 S.W.3d 789 (State v. Ballard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ballard v. State
408 S.W.3d 327 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013)