State v. Ball
711 P.2d 988, 77 Or. App. 308, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2336
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 22, 1986·No. C83-07-33480, C84-12-35437; A36004, A36005·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In this criminal case, defendant appeals three convictions for possession of a controlled substance and the revocation of a separate probation he was serving. As the state concedes, defendant’s convictions must be reversed and remanded for trial under State v. Westlund, 75 Or App 43, 705 P2d 208, rev allowed 300 Or 332 (1985).1 However, defendant’s probation revocation — which was based on matters other than the three convictions — was not erroneous. It is affirmed.
Case number C84-12-35437 reversed and remanded; case number C83-07-33480 affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Ball, 711 P.2d 988, 77 Or. App. 308, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2336 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).
711 P.2d 988 (State v. Ball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Ball
731 P.2d 1048 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1987)