State v. Ball

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Ball

711 P.2d 988, 77 Or. App. 308, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2336

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJanuary 22, 1986

DocketC83-07-33480, C84-12-35437; A36004, A36005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 711 P.2d 988 (State v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ball, 711 P.2d 988, 77 Or. App. 308, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2336 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this criminal case, defendant appeals three convictions for possession of a controlled substance and the revocation of a separate probation he was serving. As the state concedes, defendant’s convictions must be reversed and remanded for trial under State v. Westlund, 75 Or App 43, 705 P2d 208, rev allowed 300 Or 332 (1985).¹ However, defendant’s probation revocation — which was based on matters other than the three convictions — was not erroneous. It is affirmed.

Case number C84-12-35437 reversed and remanded; case number C83-07-33480 affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this criminal case, defendant appeals three convictions for possession of a controlled substance and the revocation of a separate probation he was serving. As the state concedes, defendant’s convictions must be reversed and remanded for trial under State v. Westlund, 75 Or App 43, 705 P2d 208, rev allowed 300 Or 332 (1985).¹ However, defendant’s probation revocation — which was based on matters other than the three convictions — was not erroneous. It is affirmed.

Case number C84-12-35437 reversed and remanded; case number C83-07-33480 affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

711 P.2d 988, 77 Or. App. 308, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ball-orctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack