State v. Ball

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ball

481 S.W.3d 923, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 164, 2016 WL 719651

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 2016

DocketWD 78097

StatusPublished

This text of 481 S.W.3d 923 (State v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ball, 481 S.W.3d 923, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 164, 2016 WL 719651 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Matthew Ball appeals, following a jury trial, , his conviction of the class C felony of stealing, for . which he was sentenced by the court to three, years’. imprisonment. Ball raises a single claim on appeal; he argues that the trial court committed plain error in failing, sua. sponte, to exclude testimony from the investigating officer as to why a suspect was eliminated from.his investigation. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b). % ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Matthew Ball appeals, following a jury trial, , his conviction of the class C felony of stealing, for . which he was sentenced by the court to three, years’. imprisonment. Ball raises a single claim on appeal; he argues that the trial court committed plain error in failing, sua. sponte, to exclude testimony from the investigating officer as to why a suspect was eliminated from.his investigation. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b). % ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

481 S.W.3d 923, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 164, 2016 WL 719651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ball-moctapp-2016.