State v. Ball

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Ball

292 So. 2d 241, 1974 La. LEXIS 4629

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Ball. Read the opinion of the Court — 328 So. 2d 81 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 5, 1974·No. No. 54484·Published

Opinion

In re: State of Louisiana through Charles B. Bice, District Attorney applying for Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus and Stay Order.

Writ granted. Although relator, the State, had a remedy by appeal from the judgment quashing the indictment (See C. Cr.P. Art. 912), we consider this writ since it was filed timely. The ruling of the trial court quashing the indictment is overruled and the case is remanded. See State v. St. Romain, La.1974, 292 So.2d 531.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: State of Louisiana through Charles B. Bice, District Attorney applying for Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus and Stay Order.

Writ granted. Although relator, the State, had a remedy by appeal from the judgment quashing the indictment (See C. Cr.P. Art. 912), we consider this writ since it was filed timely. The ruling of the trial court quashing the indictment is overruled and the case is remanded. See State v. St. Romain, La.1974, 292 So.2d 531.

State v. Ball, 292 So. 2d 241, 1974 La. LEXIS 4629 (La. 1974).

Pincite

292 So. 2d 241 (State v. Ball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related