State v. Baldwin
This text of 478 P.2d 437 (State v. Baldwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant, appearing with counsel, pleaded guilty [296]*296to obtaining money by false pretenses in violation of OES 165.205. She was given the maximum sentence.
On appeal she contends (1) that she was not fully advised of her rights, and (2) that the sentence was excessive.
Her first assignment of error presents no issue for review. OES 138.050; State v. Brudos, 3 Or App 239, 471 P2d 861, Sup Ct review denied (1970).
Her second assignment of error has no merit.
Affirmed.
While it is not determinative of the issue, we note from the record that defendant is not a first offender.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
478 P.2d 437, 4 Or. App. 295, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baldwin-orctapp-1970.