State v. Baldwin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

State v. Baldwin

371 S.E.2d 135, 187 Ga. App. 611, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 805

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 22, 1988

Docket77260

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 371 S.E.2d 135 (State v. Baldwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Baldwin, 371 S.E.2d 135, 187 Ga. App. 611, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 805 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Birdsong, Chief Judge.

The State brings this direct appeal from a judgment of the Ware County Superior Court affirming the award of the State Board of Workers’ Compensation. Appeals “from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of the [State] Board of Workers’ Compen[612]*612sation” must be made in accordance with the discretionary appeal procedure of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). The requirements of this code section are jurisdictional and in the absence of compliance, this court is without authority to accept an appeal. Crimminger v. Habif, 174 Ga. App. 440, 441 (330 SE2d 164). As the procedure mandated by OCGA § 5-6-35 was not followed, this appeal must be dismissed. DePass v. Bd. of Review, 172 Ga. App. 561 (324 SE2d 505).

Decided June 22, 1988. A. Mark Lee, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, for appellants. Rudolph J. Chambless, for appellee.

Appeal dismissed.

Banke, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsong, Chief Judge.

The State brings this direct appeal from a judgment of the Ware County Superior Court affirming the award of the State Board of Workers’ Compensation. Appeals “from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of the [State] Board of Workers’ Compen[612]*612sation” must be made in accordance with the discretionary appeal procedure of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). The requirements of this code section are jurisdictional and in the absence of compliance, this court is without authority to accept an appeal. Crimminger v. Habif, 174 Ga. App. 440, 441 (330 SE2d 164). As the procedure mandated by OCGA § 5-6-35 was not followed, this appeal must be dismissed. DePass v. Bd. of Review, 172 Ga. App. 561 (324 SE2d 505).

Decided June 22, 1988. A. Mark Lee, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, for appellants. Rudolph J. Chambless, for appellee.

Appeal dismissed.

Banke, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

371 S.E.2d 135, 187 Ga. App. 611, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baldwin-gactapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack