State v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

State v. Baldwin

866 S.W.2d 413, 315 Ark. 463, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 689

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedDecember 20, 1993

DocketCR 93-1283

StatusPublished

This text of 866 S.W.2d 413 (State v. Baldwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Baldwin, 866 S.W.2d 413, 315 Ark. 463, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 689 (Ark. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Benjamin Brigham Baldwin, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Brenda Horn Austin, admits in her motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Benjamin Brigham Baldwin, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Brenda Horn Austin, admits in her motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

866 S.W.2d 413, 315 Ark. 463, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baldwin-ark-1993.