State v. Baker

Washington Supreme Court

State v. Baker

430 P.3d 258

Washington Supreme Court·Decided November 28, 2018·No. No. 96071-2·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, *259Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its November 27, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review and the motion to file a supplemental petition for review are both denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, *259Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its November 27, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review and the motion to file a supplemental petition for review are both denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE

State v. Baker, 430 P.3d 258 (Wash. 2018).

Pincite

430 P.3d 258 (State v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.