State v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Baker

117 P.3d 300, 200 Or. App. 719, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 906

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 27, 2005

Docket30-04-16615; A126301

StatusPublished

This text of 117 P.3d 300 (State v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Baker, 117 P.3d 300, 200 Or. App. 719, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 906 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this civil commitment case, the trial court found that appellant is a danger to herself and to others because of a mental disorder. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A). On appeal, appellant argues that the evidence in the record is not sufficient to support the trial court’s findings. The state concedes that, based on the clear and convincing evidence standard that the statute requires, ORS 426.130, the evidence is insufficient. After reviewing the record, we conclude that appellant and the state are correct.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this civil commitment case, the trial court found that appellant is a danger to herself and to others because of a mental disorder. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A). On appeal, appellant argues that the evidence in the record is not sufficient to support the trial court’s findings. The state concedes that, based on the clear and convincing evidence standard that the statute requires, ORS 426.130, the evidence is insufficient. After reviewing the record, we conclude that appellant and the state are correct.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 P.3d 300, 200 Or. App. 719, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baker-orctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack