State v. Baker

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Baker

169 A.3d 968, 230 N.J. 468

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 1, 2017·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been opened to the Court on the State’s motion for leave to appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division’s judgment of April 11, 2017; and

It appearing that the trial court mistakenly did not provide a written explanation for its reasons when departing from the [469] pretrial services recommendation that defendant be detained, as required by N.J.S.A. 2A:162-23(a)(2), see State v. Baker, No. A-2247-1-6, 2017 WL 1326444 (App. Div. Apr. 11, 2017) (Slip op. at 3); it is hereby

ORDERED that the matter is remanded to the trial court for entry of a -written explanation of its reasons, as required by with N.J.S.A. 2A:162-28(a)(2). Jurisdiction is retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having been opened to the Court on the State’s motion for leave to appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division’s judgment of April 11, 2017; and

It appearing that the trial court mistakenly did not provide a written explanation for its reasons when departing from the [469] pretrial services recommendation that defendant be detained, as required by N.J.S.A. 2A:162-23(a)(2), see State v. Baker, No. A-2247-1-6, 2017 WL 1326444 (App. Div. Apr. 11, 2017) (Slip op. at 3); it is hereby

ORDERED that the matter is remanded to the trial court for entry of a -written explanation of its reasons, as required by with N.J.S.A. 2A:162-28(a)(2). Jurisdiction is retained.

State v. Baker, 169 A.3d 968, 230 N.J. 468 (N.J. 2017).

Pincite

169 A.3d 968 (State v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.