State v. Baker
114 N.C. 812
Opinion
It was found by his Honor that the prosecution in this action “was not for the public interest,” which was equivalent to a finding that it “was not required by the public interest.” That is conclusive. State v. Roberts, 106 N. C., 662. The appellant, C. A. Young, was marked as prosecutor on the bill before it was acted on by [813] the grand jury, and it was proper under those circumstances that he should be adjudged to be liable for costs to the exoneration of the county. The Code, §737; State v. Hamilton, 106 N. C., 660. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Baker, 114 N.C. 812 (N.C. 1894).
114 N.C. 812 (State v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. . Hamilton
10 S.E. 854 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)
State v. . Roberts
10 S.E. 900 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)