State v. Baker

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Baker

509 S.W.3d 154, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 49, 2017 WL 401838

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 31, 2017

DocketWD 79237

StatusPublished

This text of 509 S.W.3d 154 (State v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Baker, 509 S.W.3d 154, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 49, 2017 WL 401838 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

[155]*155Order

Per Curiam:

Cody Baker appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction of second-degree (felony) murder, § 565.021, for which he was sentenced by the court to thirty years’ imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Baker argues that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to both (1) allow him to play the recording of a 911 call during opening statement and (2) accept an untimely amendment to his motion for new trial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[155]*155Order

Per Curiam:

Cody Baker appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction of second-degree (felony) murder, § 565.021, for which he was sentenced by the court to thirty years’ imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Baker argues that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to both (1) allow him to play the recording of a 911 call during opening statement and (2) accept an untimely amendment to his motion for new trial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

509 S.W.3d 154, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 49, 2017 WL 401838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baker-moctapp-2017.