State v. Baker

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Baker

509 S.W.3d 154, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 49, 2017 WL 401838

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 31, 2017·No. WD 79237·Published

Opinion

[155] Order

Per Curiam:

Cody Baker appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction of second-degree (felony) murder, § 565.021, for which he was sentenced by the court to thirty years’ imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Baker argues that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to both (1) allow him to play the recording of a 911 call during opening statement and (2) accept an untimely amendment to his motion for new trial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[155] Order

Per Curiam:

Cody Baker appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction of second-degree (felony) murder, § 565.021, for which he was sentenced by the court to thirty years’ imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Baker argues that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to both (1) allow him to play the recording of a 911 call during opening statement and (2) accept an untimely amendment to his motion for new trial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Baker, 509 S.W.3d 154, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 49, 2017 WL 401838 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

509 S.W.3d 154 (State v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.