State v. Baker
949 S.W.2d 283, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1431, 1997 WL 433608
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Baker. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 816 →
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant claims the trial court erred in not overruling comments made by the prosecution during questioning of state’s key witness. Appellant was jury tried and convicted on two counts of first degree burglary (eighteen years each — to be served concurrently) and two counts of first degree robbery (eighteen years concurrent, but consecutive to burglary counts), and was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender. Judgement affirmed. Rule 30.25(b)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Baker, 949 S.W.2d 283, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1431, 1997 WL 433608 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).
949 S.W.2d 283 (State v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.