State v. Baker

862 S.W.2d 522, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1609, 1993 WL 402956
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Baker. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1005
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 12, 1993·No. Nos. 61086, 63888·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his jury conviction for illegal possession of heroin and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

The findings of fact of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b). We find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by summary order. Rule 80.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Baker, 862 S.W.2d 522, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1609, 1993 WL 402956 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

862 S.W.2d 522 (State v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.