State v. Baker

Supreme Court of Kansas

State v. Baker

90 P. 1133, 75 Kan. 862, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 173

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedMay 11, 1907

DocketNo. 15,069

StatusPublished

This text of 90 P. 1133 (State v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Baker, 90 P. 1133, 75 Kan. 862, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 173 (kan 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

At the time the information was amended the county attorney had the right to amend it in form or substance as he desired.

[863]*863The defendant having been lawfully arrested, and having given bond to abide the orders of the court and not to depart without leave, continued to be rightfully in custody. New process was not necessary to hold him.

The amendments having been interlined upon a filed document, it did not need to be refiled.

The evidence complained of was properly admitted. The verdict is sustained by sufficient evidence, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

At the time the information was amended the county attorney had the right to amend it in form or substance as he desired.

[863]*863The defendant having been lawfully arrested, and having given bond to abide the orders of the court and not to depart without leave, continued to be rightfully in custody. New process was not necessary to hold him.

The amendments having been interlined upon a filed document, it did not need to be refiled.

The evidence complained of was properly admitted. The verdict is sustained by sufficient evidence, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 P. 1133, 75 Kan. 862, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baker-kan-1907.