State v. Baker

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Baker. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Haw. 1
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 22, 2013·No. SCWC-11-0000666·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000666

22-OCT-2013

01:13 PM

SCWC-11-0000666

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

KAOLINO RICHARD BAKER, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000666; FC-CR NO. 10-1-0329K)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Kaolino Richard Baker’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on September 16, 2013,

is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 22, 2013.

James S. Tabe /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Linda L. Walton

for respondent /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Baker, (haw 2013).

State v. Baker (State v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.