State v. Bain

32 S.W.3d 137, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1569, 2000 WL 1576973
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 24, 2000
DocketNo. ED 77330
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 S.W.3d 137 (State v. Bain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bain, 32 S.W.3d 137, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1569, 2000 WL 1576973 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith Bain (Defendant) appeals from his convictions for second degree burglary, section 569.170, RSMo 1994, possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202, RSMo 1994, and possession of drug paraphernalia, section 195.233, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the parties’ exclusive use setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bain v. State
59 S.W.3d 625 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 S.W.3d 137, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1569, 2000 WL 1576973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bain-moctapp-2000.