State v. Bain
This text of 32 S.W.3d 137 (State v. Bain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Keith Bain (Defendant) appeals from his convictions for second degree burglary, section 569.170, RSMo 1994, possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202, RSMo 1994, and possession of drug paraphernalia, section 195.233, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the parties’ exclusive use setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 S.W.3d 137, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1569, 2000 WL 1576973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bain-moctapp-2000.