State v. Bailey

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Manix A. Bailey, Appellant.

---

Appeal From York County
Judge Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-672
Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed December 9, 2008 

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Manix A. Bailey appeals his guilty pleas for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, trafficking crack cocaine more than ten grams, and two counts of distribution of crack cocaine and four concurrent sentences of twelve years.  He maintains his guilty plea failed to conform with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1] 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, HUFF, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.