State v. Bailey

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Bailey. Read the opinion of the Court — 368 S.C. 39
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided December 16, 2003·No. 2003-UP-729·Unpublished

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

Jomo R. Bailey,        Appellant.


Appeal From Spartanburg County
J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-729 
Submitted October 15, 2003 – Filed December 16, 2003


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant, Jomo R. Bailey, was indicted for trafficking in cocaine.  Following a jury trial, Bailey was convicted as charged and sentenced to twenty-five years.   We dismiss pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991).  Counsel’s petition to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bailey, (S.C. Ct. App. 2003).

State v. Bailey (State v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Williams
406 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)