State v. Bailey
This text of 1994 Ohio 516 (State v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 68 Ohio St.3d 1212.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. BAILEY, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Bailey, 1994-Ohio-516.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 92-2122—Submitted December 8, 1993—Decided January 26, 1994.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 91-L-021. __________________ Steven C. LaTourette, Lake County Prosecuting Attorney, Ariane E. Tarighati, Kimberly A. Mahaney and Geoffrey W. Weaver, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant. John J. Gill, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1994 Ohio 516, 68 Ohio St. 3d 1212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bailey-ohio-1994.