State v. Bailey
This text of 198 S.E.2d 724 (State v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Larry Donald BAILEY.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., George W. Boylan, Associate Atty., for the State.
Jones, Jones & Herbin, for defendant.
Petition for writ of certiorari by defendant to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 18 N.C.App. 313, 196 S.E.2d 556. Denied. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 S.E.2d 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bailey-nc-1973.