State v. Bailey

198 S.E.2d 724
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedAugust 31, 1973
StatusPublished

This text of 198 S.E.2d 724 (State v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bailey, 198 S.E.2d 724 (N.C. 1973).

Opinion

198 S.E.2d 724 (1973)

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Larry Donald BAILEY.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 31, 1973.

Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., George W. Boylan, Associate Atty., for the State.

Jones, Jones & Herbin, for defendant.

Petition for writ of certiorari by defendant to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 18 N.C.App. 313, 196 S.E.2d 556. Denied. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bailey
196 S.E.2d 556 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 S.E.2d 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bailey-nc-1973.