State v. Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Bailey

136 S.E.2d 37, 261 N.C. 783, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 560

DecidedMay 6, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E.2d 37 (State v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bailey, 136 S.E.2d 37, 261 N.C. 783, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 560 (N.C. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The' evidence is sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion for nonsuit. G.S. 15-173. When considered contextually the charge of the court complies with G.S. 1-180. Applicable principles of law were explained to the jury in a substantially correct manner. State v. Phillips, 256 N.C. 445, 124 S.E. 2d 146; State v. Jestes, 185 N.C. 735, 117 S.E. 385; State v. Peterson, 129 N.C. 556, 40 S.E. 9. We find from the record no error sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The' evidence is sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion for nonsuit. G.S. 15-173. When considered contextually the charge of the court complies with G.S. 1-180. Applicable principles of law were explained to the jury in a substantially correct manner. State v. Phillips, 256 N.C. 445, 124 S.E. 2d 146; State v. Jestes, 185 N.C. 735, 117 S.E. 385; State v. Peterson, 129 N.C. 556, 40 S.E. 9. We find from the record no error sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.E.2d 37, 261 N.C. 783, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bailey-nc-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack