State v. Bailey
136 S.E.2d 37, 261 N.C. 783, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 560
Opinion
The' evidence is sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion for nonsuit. G.S. 15-173. When considered contextually the charge of the court complies with G.S. 1-180. Applicable principles of law were explained to the jury in a substantially correct manner. State v. Phillips, 256 N.C. 445, 124 S.E. 2d 146; State v. Jestes, 185 N.C. 735, 117 S.E. 385; State v. Peterson, 129 N.C. 556, 40 S.E. 9. We find from the record no error sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Bailey, 136 S.E.2d 37, 261 N.C. 783, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 560 (N.C. 1964).
136 S.E.2d 37 (State v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Phillips
124 S.E.2d 146 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
State v. Peterson.
40 S.E. 9 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1901)
State v. Jestes
117 S.E. 385 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)