State v. Bailey

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Bailey

515 A.2d 743, 1986 Me. LEXIS 879

DecidedSeptember 24, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 515 A.2d 743 (State v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bailey, 515 A.2d 743, 1986 Me. LEXIS 879 (Me. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Stephen Bailey, on appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Cumberland County, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of guilt of criminal mischief with a dangerous weapon, 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 806, 1252 (1983) and of two counts of reckless conduct with the use of a firearm, 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 211, 1252(4), (5) (1983). The record discloses that the trier of fact rationally could have found every element of the crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. See State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Stephen Bailey, on appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Cumberland County, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of guilt of criminal mischief with a dangerous weapon, 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 806, 1252 (1983) and of two counts of reckless conduct with the use of a firearm, 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 211, 1252(4), (5) (1983). The record discloses that the trier of fact rationally could have found every element of the crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. See State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

515 A.2d 743, 1986 Me. LEXIS 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bailey-me-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack