State v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Bailey

483 So. 2d 608

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 28, 1986

DocketNo. 81-K-2173

StatusPublished

This text of 483 So. 2d 608 (State v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bailey, 483 So. 2d 608 (La. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

DENNIS, Justice,

concurring.

I fully subscribe to the concurring reasons assigned by Justice Calogero. Additionally, there is no doubt that the officers made a permissible Terry-type stop without probable cause to arrest prior to the seizure. Physical contact or a search is not the minimum intrusion which can be characterized as a Terry-type stop, which may consist of a “brief stop of a suspicious individual, in order to determine his identity or to maintain the status quo momentarily while obtaining more information.” Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146, 92 S.Ct. 1921, 1923, 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DENNIS, Justice,

concurring.

I fully subscribe to the concurring reasons assigned by Justice Calogero. Additionally, there is no doubt that the officers made a permissible Terry-type stop without probable cause to arrest prior to the seizure. Physical contact or a search is not the minimum intrusion which can be characterized as a Terry-type stop, which may consist of a “brief stop of a suspicious individual, in order to determine his identity or to maintain the status quo momentarily while obtaining more information.” Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146, 92 S.Ct. 1921, 1923, 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

483 So. 2d 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bailey-la-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack