State v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Bailey

483 So. 2d 608

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 28, 1986·No. No. 81-K-2173·Published

Opinion

DENNIS, Justice,

concurring.

I fully subscribe to the concurring reasons assigned by Justice Calogero. Additionally, there is no doubt that the officers made a permissible Terry-type stop without probable cause to arrest prior to the seizure. Physical contact or a search is not the minimum intrusion which can be characterized as a Terry-type stop, which may consist of a “brief stop of a suspicious individual, in order to determine his identity or to maintain the status quo momentarily while obtaining more information.” Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146, 92 S.Ct. 1921, 1923, 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DENNIS, Justice,

concurring.

I fully subscribe to the concurring reasons assigned by Justice Calogero. Additionally, there is no doubt that the officers made a permissible Terry-type stop without probable cause to arrest prior to the seizure. Physical contact or a search is not the minimum intrusion which can be characterized as a Terry-type stop, which may consist of a “brief stop of a suspicious individual, in order to determine his identity or to maintain the status quo momentarily while obtaining more information.” Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146, 92 S.Ct. 1921, 1923, 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972).

State v. Bailey, 483 So. 2d 608 (La. 1986).

Pincite

483 So. 2d 608 (State v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related