State v. Bailey

97 So. 851, 154 La. 536, 1923 La. LEXIS 1975
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 22, 1923·No. No. 26083·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

O’NIELL, C. J.

The district attorney concedes that the verdict and sentence in thi? [537] case are null because the defendant, appellant, was tried by a jury composed of 12 members for a crime for which he should have been tried by a jury of only 5 members. Const, art. 7, § 41; State v. Thompson, 104 La. 167, 28 South. 882; State v. Beebe, 127 La. 493, 53 South. 730; State v. Reeves, 128 La. 37, 54 South. 415; State v. Desselles, 150 La. 494, 90 South. 773; State v. Stephens, 150 La. 944, 91 South. 349, 23 A. L. R. 286; State v. Hataway, 153 La. 751, 96 South. 556.

The verdict and sentence are annulled, and it is ordered that the case be remanded to the criminal district court for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bailey, 97 So. 851, 154 La. 536, 1923 La. LEXIS 1975 (La. 1923).

97 So. 851 (State v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jones
922 So. 2d 508 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2006)
State v. Jones
888 So. 2d 885 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004)
State v. Ferguson
474 So. 2d 964 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)
State v. Nedds
364 So. 2d 588 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1978)
State v. White
136 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1931)
State v. Flattmann
135 So. 3 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1931)
State v. Jacques
132 So. 657 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1931)
State v. Hill
130 So. 865 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1930)