State v. Bailey
This text of 111 P. 190 (State v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a conviction under the prohibitory law. The appellant complains that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence, that the instructions given to the Jury are erroneous, and that the refusal of the court to give '.those requested by the appellant is also erroneous.
There are no separate statements of the errors complained of, ■as required by subdivision 2 of rule 10 of this court, but we have carefully examined the abstract and briefs and are unable to find any material or prejudicial error in the proceedings, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 P. 190, 83 Kan. 804, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bailey-kan-1910.