State v. Bailey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Bailey

697 So. 2d 1319, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9668, 1997 WL 484679

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 22, 1997

DocketNo. 97-1968

StatusPublished

This text of 697 So. 2d 1319 (State v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bailey, 697 So. 2d 1319, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9668, 1997 WL 484679 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is before the court by way of a petition for a writ of certiorari.

Petitioner has filed this petition and a cross-appeal in a plenary appeal filed by appellee from the criminal case below. This petition is thus duplicative of the cross-appeal and unnecessary, assuming there was a “departure from the essential requirements [1320]*1320of law,” which we do not assume here. If petitioner is entitled to appellate relief, then that remedy is available in its appeal.

WRIT DENIED.

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is before the court by way of a petition for a writ of certiorari.

Petitioner has filed this petition and a cross-appeal in a plenary appeal filed by appellee from the criminal case below. This petition is thus duplicative of the cross-appeal and unnecessary, assuming there was a “departure from the essential requirements [1320]*1320of law,” which we do not assume here. If petitioner is entitled to appellate relief, then that remedy is available in its appeal.

WRIT DENIED.

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

697 So. 2d 1319, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9668, 1997 WL 484679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bailey-fladistctapp-1997.