State v. Bailey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Bailey

614 So. 2d 1224, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3666, 1993 WL 88675

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 30, 1993

DocketNos. 92-1064, 92-1076 and 92-1243

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 614 So. 2d 1224 (State v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bailey, 614 So. 2d 1224, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3666, 1993 WL 88675 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals orders which granted motions to dismiss in three criminal cases. The appeals have been consolidated because all involve the same issue. In each case, the trial court dismissed the information based upon its conclusion that section 893.13(l)(i), Florida Statutes (Supp.1990), is unconstitutionally vague because the term “public housing facility” is undefined.

Subsequent to the trial court’s decisions in these cases, this court has addressed the precise issue raised here, concluding that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague. [1225]*1225Brown v. State, 610 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Turner v. State, 615 So.2d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA Mar. 16, 1993). Accordingly, in all three cases, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court reinstate the information.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

SMITH, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI