State v. Bahamonde

Connecticut Appellate Court

State v. Bahamonde

570 A.2d 245, 21 Conn. App. 801, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 64

Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided February 15, 1990·No. 7406·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm in violation of General Statutes § BSa-ñBa.1 He claims that the trial court erred (1) in its instruction to the jury after a report of deadlock, (2) in its instructions on reasonable doubt, and (3) in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal.

After a plenary review of the record, transcripts and briefs, and after affording each claim of error the appropriate scope of review, we conclude that all claims are without merit. Schiavone v. Schiavone, 18 Conn. App. 825, 559 A.2d 1192 (1989).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm in violation of General Statutes § BSa-ñBa.1 He claims that the trial court erred (1) in its instruction to the jury after a report of deadlock, (2) in its instructions on reasonable doubt, and (3) in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal.

After a plenary review of the record, transcripts and briefs, and after affording each claim of error the appropriate scope of review, we conclude that all claims are without merit. Schiavone v. Schiavone, 18 Conn. App. 825, 559 A.2d 1192 (1989).

There is no error.

State v. Bahamonde, 570 A.2d 245, 21 Conn. App. 801, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 64 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

570 A.2d 245 (State v. Bahamonde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related