State v. Bagley
256 S.W.3d 219, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 882, 2008 WL 2572581
Opinion
ORDER
Clinton Bagley appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for driving while intoxicated. Bagley complains that the trial court erred in denying his motion for mistrial. We find no abuse of discretion. As a formal published opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Bagley, 256 S.W.3d 219, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 882, 2008 WL 2572581 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
256 S.W.3d 219 (State v. Bagley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Groff v. Groff
256 S.W.3d 219 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)