State v. Bagley

57 So. 271, 129 La. 926, 1912 La. LEXIS 1027
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJanuary 2, 1912
DocketNo. 19,154
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 57 So. 271 (State v. Bagley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bagley, 57 So. 271, 129 La. 926, 1912 La. LEXIS 1027 (La. 1912).

Opinion

BREAUX, C. J.

The defendant was proceeded against on the charge of keeping a grog and tippling shop and of retailing intoxicants.

From a sentence condemning him to pay a fine of $350, costs, and to serve 90 days on the public road, and, in default of payment, to serve an additional 90 days, he appealed.

Defendant filed a motion for a bill of particulars.

The district attorney complied with the bill of particulars.

It does not appear that any objection was filed to the answer of the prosecuting officer as insufficient.

There is no bill in the record.

It is wel,l settled in jurisprudence, when no bill of exceptions is taken, no motion in arrest filed, nor an assignment of error, no error appearing on the face of the record, the verdict and the judgment will not be disturbed.

That being the case here, it only remains for us to affirm the judgment.

For reasons stated, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Peoples
103 So. 38 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1925)
State v. Schrieber
102 So. 678 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 So. 271, 129 La. 926, 1912 La. LEXIS 1027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bagley-la-1912.