Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. . Baggy

State v. . Baggy

10 S.E. 913, 106 N.C. 690
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 S.E. 913 (State v. . Baggy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Baggy, 10 S.E. 913, 106 N.C. 690 (N.C. 1890).

Opinion

The defendant was an itinerant dentist, and was indicted for practicing his profession without a license. We are unable to see any cause for this appeal. No error is assigned, and, upon examination, we find the record regular and unexceptionable. In such a case the judgment will be affirmed. S. v. Freeman, 93 N.C. 558; S.v. Bell, 103 N.C. 438.

Judgment affirmed.

(691)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Elseffer
92 N.W. 772 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 S.E. 913, 106 N.C. 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baggy-nc-1890.