State v. . Baggy
10 S.E. 913, 106 N.C. 690
Opinion
The defendant was an itinerant dentist, and was indicted for practicing his profession without a license.
We are unable to see any cause for this appeal. No error is assigned, and, upon examination, we find the record regular and unexceptionable. In such a case the judgment will be affirmed. S. v. Freeman,
Judgment affirmed.
(691)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. . Baggy, 10 S.E. 913, 106 N.C. 690 (N.C. 1890).
10 S.E. 913 (State v. . Baggy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adams v. Elseffer
92 N.W. 772 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1902)