State v. Baez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Baez

704 So. 2d 693, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14346, 1997 WL 824818

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 24, 1997·No. No. 97-00864·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the trial court’s order suppressing statements made by the defendant, Alexander Baez. In its ruling, the trial court relied on State v. Guthrie, 666 So.2d 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Subsequently, the supreme court reversed Guthrie, citing its recent decision in Sapp v. State, 690 So.2d 581 (Fla.1997). See State v. Guthrie, 692 So.2d 888 (Fla.1997). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

PARKER, C.J., and PATTERSON and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the trial court’s order suppressing statements made by the defendant, Alexander Baez. In its ruling, the trial court relied on State v. Guthrie, 666 So.2d 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Subsequently, the supreme court reversed Guthrie, citing its recent decision in Sapp v. State, 690 So.2d 581 (Fla.1997). See State v. Guthrie, 692 So.2d 888 (Fla.1997). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

PARKER, C.J., and PATTERSON and FULMER, JJ., concur.

State v. Baez, 704 So. 2d 693, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14346, 1997 WL 824818 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

704 So. 2d 693 (State v. Baez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related