State v. Baez
This text of 704 So. 2d 693 (State v. Baez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The State appeals the trial court’s order suppressing statements made by the defendant, Alexander Baez. In its ruling, the trial court relied on State v. Guthrie, 666 So.2d 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Subsequently, the supreme court reversed Guthrie, citing its recent decision in Sapp v. State, 690 So.2d 581 (Fla.1997). See State v. Guthrie, 692 So.2d 888 (Fla.1997). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress and remand for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
704 So. 2d 693, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14346, 1997 WL 824818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baez-fladistctapp-1997.