State v. Baez-Acuna

559 So. 2d 1298, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2814, 1990 WL 49840
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 24, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1117
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 559 So. 2d 1298 (State v. Baez-Acuna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Baez-Acuna, 559 So. 2d 1298, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2814, 1990 WL 49840 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellee having conceded error in the downward departure of a sentence below the statutory minimum mandatory provided in Section 893.135, Florida Statutes (1987), following a plea, the sentence is reversed and the matter is returned to the trial court with directions to permit the defendant therein to withdraw his plea and proceed to trial. See Anderson v. State, 507 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); State v. Row, 478 So.2d 430 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); State v. Samudio, 460 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Walker
588 So. 2d 1097 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State v. Hill
585 So. 2d 504 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Gonzalez v. Shapiro
574 So. 2d 1193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
559 So. 2d 1298, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2814, 1990 WL 49840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baez-acuna-fladistctapp-1990.