State v. Bachmeyer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Bachmeyer

208 N.W. 995, 167 Minn. 520

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMay 14, 1926

DocketNo. 25,347.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 208 N.W. 995 (State v. Bachmeyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bachmeyer, 208 N.W. 995, 167 Minn. 520 (Mich. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

*521 PER CURIAM.

Appeal from judgment of conviction of selling intoxicating liquor. The one assignment of error questions the sufficiency of the evidence and is without merit. The only witness was the purchaser. He was not an accomplice. State v. Brand, 124 Minn. 408, 145 N. W. 39; State v. Tremont, 160 Minn. 314, 315, 200 N. W. 93; 16 C. J. 683. The weight of his testimony was for the trier of fact.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*521 PER CURIAM.

Appeal from judgment of conviction of selling intoxicating liquor. The one assignment of error questions the sufficiency of the evidence and is without merit. The only witness was the purchaser. He was not an accomplice. State v. Brand, 124 Minn. 408, 145 N. W. 39; State v. Tremont, 160 Minn. 314, 315, 200 N. W. 93; 16 C. J. 683. The weight of his testimony was for the trier of fact.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 N.W. 995, 167 Minn. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bachmeyer-minn-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack