State v. Bachmeyer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Bachmeyer

208 N.W. 995, 167 Minn. 520

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 14, 1926·No. No. 25,347.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*521 PER CURIAM.

Appeal from judgment of conviction of selling intoxicating liquor. The one assignment of error questions the sufficiency of the evidence and is without merit. The only witness was the purchaser. He was not an accomplice. State v. Brand, 124 Minn. 408, 145 N. W. 39; State v. Tremont, 160 Minn. 314, 315, 200 N. W. 93; 16 C. J. 683. The weight of his testimony was for the trier of fact.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*521 PER CURIAM.

Appeal from judgment of conviction of selling intoxicating liquor. The one assignment of error questions the sufficiency of the evidence and is without merit. The only witness was the purchaser. He was not an accomplice. State v. Brand, 124 Minn. 408, 145 N. W. 39; State v. Tremont, 160 Minn. 314, 315, 200 N. W. 93; 16 C. J. 683. The weight of his testimony was for the trier of fact.

Judgment affirmed.

State v. Bachmeyer, 208 N.W. 995, 167 Minn. 520 (Mich. 1926).

Pincite

208 N.W. 995 (State v. Bachmeyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related