State v. Baccus

825 N.E.2d 157, 105 Ohio St. 3d 288
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 20, 2005
DocketNo. 2004-2036
StatusPublished

This text of 825 N.E.2d 157 (State v. Baccus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Baccus, 825 N.E.2d 157, 105 Ohio St. 3d 288 (Ohio 2005).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Fraley, 105 Ohio St.3d 13, 2004-Ohio-7110, 821 N.E.2d 995, and consideration of appellee’s remaining assignments of error.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Fraley
2004 Ohio 7110 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
825 N.E.2d 157, 105 Ohio St. 3d 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baccus-ohio-2005.