State v. Baccus

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Baccus

825 N.E.2d 157, 105 Ohio St. 3d 288

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 20, 2005·No. No. 2004-2036·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Fraley, 105 Ohio St.3d 13, 2004-Ohio-7110, 821 N.E.2d 995, and consideration of appellee’s remaining assignments of error.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Fraley, 105 Ohio St.3d 13, 2004-Ohio-7110, 821 N.E.2d 995, and consideration of appellee’s remaining assignments of error.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

State v. Baccus, 825 N.E.2d 157, 105 Ohio St. 3d 288 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

825 N.E.2d 157 (State v. Baccus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related