State v. Baccari

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Baccari

730 So. 2d 806, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4319, 1999 WL 187294

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 7, 1999

DocketNo. 98-1734

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 730 So. 2d 806 (State v. Baccari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Baccari, 730 So. 2d 806, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4319, 1999 WL 187294 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals a departure sentence, arguing that the reasons given by the trial court are not valid grounds for departure. At the sentencing hearing a number of reasons for departure were discussed, and the state argued that some of them were either no longer valid or were not valid under the facts of this case. The court then pronounced the sentence and listed four written reasons for departure on the scoresheet. We affirm without reaching the issue of whether the reasons were valid, because we find that [807]*807the state failed to object to at least two of the four reasons contained on the scoresheet. The alleged error may not, therefore, be raised on appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d). State v. Henriquez, 717 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) and cases cited.

Affirmed

POLEN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals a departure sentence, arguing that the reasons given by the trial court are not valid grounds for departure. At the sentencing hearing a number of reasons for departure were discussed, and the state argued that some of them were either no longer valid or were not valid under the facts of this case. The court then pronounced the sentence and listed four written reasons for departure on the scoresheet. We affirm without reaching the issue of whether the reasons were valid, because we find that [807]*807the state failed to object to at least two of the four reasons contained on the scoresheet. The alleged error may not, therefore, be raised on appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d). State v. Henriquez, 717 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) and cases cited.

Affirmed

POLEN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

730 So. 2d 806, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4319, 1999 WL 187294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baccari-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack