State v. Baca

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Baca

707 So. 2d 766, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 70, 1998 WL 97709

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 9, 1998

DocketNo. 96-04661

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 707 So. 2d 766 (State v. Baca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Baca, 707 So. 2d 766, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 70, 1998 WL 97709 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the trial court’s order reducing Baca’s sentence. The motion to reconsider the sentence was filed 103 days following the dismissal of Baca’s appeal. We treat the State’s appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, grant the writ, and quash the order of mitigation.

The State correctly argues that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to recon[767]*767sider the denial of Baca’s motion to reduce his sentence. On July 19, 1996, this court issued an order of dismissal of Baca’s appeal. Thereafter, on August 19, 1996, Baca filed a motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). The trial court denied the motion to reduce. Then on October 30, 1996, Baca filed a motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to reduce. Following a hearing on that motion, the trial court reduced Baca’s sentence.

The denial of a motion to reduce a legal sentence is generally not appealable. See Lee v. State, 662 So.2d 731 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). The motion for reconsideration was filed over thirty days after the denial of the motion and outside of the sixty-day limit provided in rule 3.800(c). Accordingly, the trial court did not have jurisdiction on October 30,1996, to reduce Baca’s sentence. See State v. Rhodes, 554 So.2d 1229, 1230 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

In Rhodes, this court held that “the proper vehicle to request review on such grounds” is by writ of certiorari. Id. at 1230. Accordingly, we grant the writ, quash the order of mitigation, and remand with instructions that the trial court reinstate the original sentence.

PARKER, C.J., and PATTERSON and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the trial court’s order reducing Baca’s sentence. The motion to reconsider the sentence was filed 103 days following the dismissal of Baca’s appeal. We treat the State’s appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, grant the writ, and quash the order of mitigation.

The State correctly argues that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to recon[767]*767sider the denial of Baca’s motion to reduce his sentence. On July 19, 1996, this court issued an order of dismissal of Baca’s appeal. Thereafter, on August 19, 1996, Baca filed a motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). The trial court denied the motion to reduce. Then on October 30, 1996, Baca filed a motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to reduce. Following a hearing on that motion, the trial court reduced Baca’s sentence.

The denial of a motion to reduce a legal sentence is generally not appealable. See Lee v. State, 662 So.2d 731 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). The motion for reconsideration was filed over thirty days after the denial of the motion and outside of the sixty-day limit provided in rule 3.800(c). Accordingly, the trial court did not have jurisdiction on October 30,1996, to reduce Baca’s sentence. See State v. Rhodes, 554 So.2d 1229, 1230 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

In Rhodes, this court held that “the proper vehicle to request review on such grounds” is by writ of certiorari. Id. at 1230. Accordingly, we grant the writ, quash the order of mitigation, and remand with instructions that the trial court reinstate the original sentence.

PARKER, C.J., and PATTERSON and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

707 So. 2d 766, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 70, 1998 WL 97709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-baca-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack